Skip to main content

The Redundant Identity

"Give up a member to save a family, a family to save a village, a village to save a country, and the country to save yourself."  - Koutilya in his "Arthasasthra"

What can we infer from the above statement? Every subsequent item in the list is bigger and more important than the previous item? The family greater than a member. The village greater than the family. Country greater than the Village. And more importantly, you are more important than the country. Deep inside most of us would concur with the last statement more than the first. But the obligation and desire to stay on the correct side of the moral fabric would make us bemoan that statement.

We have been repetitively "told" that the country is more than anything. The Father of the Nation fought for the Country's independence. The modern God, Sachin Tendulkar constantly tells us that nothing is greater than playing and performing for the country. Every year, in the middle of August, we have been "celebrating" Independence Day. Celebrating the identity of being an Indian.

Now the question is what is India? What are its attributes? For the larger part, we identify India by its political boundaries. A person born in Sri Lanka is called a Lankan. The one born in Myanmar, a Burmese. What if the "Political" India includes those regions? What if some thousand years ago, some "Indian" ruler had expanded his empire to include all these regions and managed to hold on those regions? They would have become part of the current India. That would have made them "Indians" as well. Should they (now Burmese or Lankan) be proud of being a "Possible" Indian? The argument sounds confusing, but you'd get the point. The geographic or political India as it is defined right now is more a result of conquests of emperors of the recent past.

My first and foremost argument against the "Indian" identity, is that it is primarily derived from geographical boundaries. If geographical boundaries can define my identity, I would like to hold on to an identity which is more specific and closer to me - in the form of a South Indian or Tamilian (of Tamil Nadu, rather than the language I speak), or Madrasi or Choolaimeduvaasi etc. As I reduce geographical space for defining my identity, it sounds incredible and borders on a joke. In that case, why shouldn't I consider the so called "National" Identity as a joke? At the end of the day, both are defined by the geographical area I live in? In any event of competitive nature, don't we all support the group which geographically is closer to us?

One can't deny the above assertion by saying that India is a concept or an idea. Concept of having multiple and diverse cultures, yet still living together in peace, believing in universal brotherhood and all the usual brouhaha. Asia is a far better example of a place with more diverse cultures and religions. The world as a whole is an even better example. In fact, the modern day towns are the finest examples of people from multiple cultures, diverse socio economic background, living in close proximity. Wouldn't such geographical boundaries be a better attribute for an identity.

The national identity is one of administrative in nature. It is more of an identity created for convenience of governance. And extrapolating such an idea of identity into something to be "proud of" sounds demented, to say the least. Building on this, the concept of patriotism is also often overhyped.

With the ever reducing distance between places, cross border investments and business operations, improved economic transactions between countries, ever increasing migration across countries and continents, ever increasing number of people embracing newer cultures and countries than the one they were born in, the idea of the nation being one big identity is losing its relevance. The person born today, as some has rightly said, is a citizen of the world. Why restrict his identity to the country of passport he holds?

The place we are born, or the community we are born in, does not define us. And in times that we live in, such "National" identity is redundant to say the least. And as the lead lady in the Batman Begins (2005) says to Bruce Wayne "Its not who you are underneath, its what you do that defines you." And that is the most apt definition of the most relevant identity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Open Letter to the President, ICAI

Dear President,
The substance of this letter is the state of examination and evaluation system of our Institute's qualifying exams. The recently declared result is just the tipping point, and not the substance of this letter. Let this communique not be misconstrued as demanding a revamp merely because the results have been pathetically low. This open letter would have probably been drafted still, even if the results threw out an extremely student friendly outcome of say 100% Pass.
Before I move on to present my points, I would like to state that I have been a firm believer of assertion that you get only what you deserve. A person who got "100 Marks" deserved that "100 Marks". And a student who got "0 Marks", deserved that as well. As someone who got both the above extremes during my academic days, I have maintained the above assertion with a certain degree of understanding and conviction.
I also would like to make it clear right at the outset that, I ten…

Caste Masters

The UP Municipal election results are out and BJP has won. And people are going bonkers. At one end, BJP is taunting Congress for losing and losing very badly, and at the other side, Congress is highlighting that BJP has lost a seat / few seats in the constituency of Yogi Adithyanath / Keshav Prasad Maurya. Considering that this sounds more like that famous "Pass Persua Fail Perusa" from the movie Gentleman, I can happily ignore their rants as a joke.  It is the media coverage of the same is the one that gets my goat.
There is a moron who confidently concludes that "Yogi Adityanath has kept the BJP's vote bank of upper castes firmly with him as these results indicate.". And another moron has attributed BSP's victory to the support of Dalit-Muslims. Where do they get these inferences from? Are they having access to some information which even the Election Commission does not have? Has any one ever mentioned their caste when they vote? No one knows who an indiv…

Rebooting AdZap

Two years back, In an inter-school competition I had gone to judge the AdZap event, I could see that the quality had not at all improved over the period since I was a college student taking part in such events. It was the same mimicry stuff imitating some actors, or doing some rap stuff for promoting a product. The influence of movies and sports was immense. It was the same "brand-ambassador-sermon" kind of ads that was thrown at the judges. There was absolutely no originality or creativity. The entire tamasha sounded so stale that I was literally searching for fresh air. Realizing at the same time, how stupid and juvenile our performances would have been then.
If the performance was stale, the format of the event was more mind numbing. It had not changed at all! Atleast the performance of the students had new cine stars being imitated and latest movie dialogues being mouthed, whereas the formats and rules for the event had not undergone one bit of a change. The same one minu…